One London

My Photo
Name:
Location: London, England, United Kingdom





Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Angry fucking rant about LAW BREAKERS!

Is there anyone more damaging to the Muslim cause than Martin Sullivan at Islamophobia Watch?

In this following editorial lifted from the Morning Star, people supportive of anti-racism and equality with any ounce of decency will feel angry and used. So badly are these arguments (by Sullivan and the Morning Star) expressed, that you come away wondering about the intellect and honesty of of the people involved.
Peace campaigners condemned the "racist" mass media and accused ministers of applying "double standards" against the persecuted Muslim community yesterday. The comments followed government pressure on police to carry out mass arrests of Friday's protestors in London against offensive caricatures of the Muslim prophet Mohammed. At the event, some extremists threatened "another July 7", while others dressed as suicide bombers.
If peace campaigners condemned the mass media for being racist, simply for covering what was actually happened then that's their perogative. My perogative is to label these people "bloody idiots". Was the government pressuring the police to carry out "mass arrests"? Or was it the case that they wanted the perpetrators who were BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW arrested? Oh, and so much for "some" extremists? It looked like a very organised group to me (more or likely The Saviour Sect or Al-Muj), to dismiss them as "some" seems like an attempt to minimise the amount of these idiots and to diminish the fact that they BROKE THE FUCKING LAW deliberately and were not PUNISHED.

Home Secretary Charles Clarke seized on the furore to demand that MPs back his repressive anti-terror Bill when it returns to the Commons on February 15. Mr Clarke urged support for a ban on "glorification" or "encouragement" of terrorism, which was thrown out by the Lords. He also hinted that police will shortly make a wave of arrests following the weekend demonstrations.
A 'wave' of arrests? For people who were inciting murder and gloryfying the London bombers? Good. That's what the Police and CPS are paid for.

While rejecting the extremist protest, peace campaigners joined British Muslim leaders in condemning media "double standards" and its "mirage argument" – claiming to champion freedom of speech while attacking a minority group already facing persecution.
This is really too easy. How is the British media attacking a minority group (unless of course you mean the moronic group holding up placards)? The British media didn't publish the cartoons on grounds of taste and sensitivity. The media merely asked why the Police weren't arresting people who were openly BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW!

The cartoons, caricaturing Mohammed as a terrorist and a killer, were first published by right-wing Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten last September. The images have since been reprinted in many European countries, such as France and Norway, by other right-wing titles.

But not by British papers! So why excuse the fuckwits who held up banners supporting the London bombers?

The entire episode is taking place at the height of Western aggression in the Middle East, with the ongoing war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan joined by recent threats from the international community to cut funds to the Palestinian government over the recent election of Hamas.
What has that got to do with the idiots who openly BROKE THE FUCKING LAW while the Police stood around doing sweet FA. Are you justifying their twattish actions by mentioning Palestine, Afghanistand and Iraq? Where were these retards with their banners when Iraq and Afghanistan was invaded. These twats are Al-Muj rent-a-crowd. they don't give aflying fig about their Muslim 'brothers'. They're the Islamic equivalent of the BNP. Always looking to stir trouble, never looking to provide answers and support to their own community.

Campaigners branded the action "racial stereotyping", likening the images to those of Jews by anti-semites and nazis in the early to mid-20th century. Respect national secretary John Rees said that Islamophobia has become "the last acceptable form of racism". He said: "If this were a cartoon of a hook-nosed Jew counting money, the liberal press would be, rightly, full of angry editorials denouncing the racism of such images."
Likening it to images of Jews by anti-Semites and Nazis? How about the numerous examples of anti-semitic images by the Islamic world...... now in this present day? How about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion being passed off as fact in Arab literature, newspapers and websites. How many embassies have Jewish people burned down lately? How many people have been killed because of anti-semitic cartoons? How many Jews have stood on street corners demanding the murder of cartoonists?

What should I expect from the Morning Star? Not much I supppose, but at least they picked their side. They're actively anti-Muslim.....by supporting the myth that it's the media and western world are to blame for the extremist Muslims BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW they're putting at risk the millions of Muslims who don't support death and destruction, the Muslims who were equally disgusted by the freaks on parade on most front pages.

(Perhaps next time to encourage the Police to do their job, instead of dressing up as suicide bombers, the extremists should be encouraged to wear Burberry and Stone Island. On a Saturday before a kick off at any football leagure ground this guarantees arrest/beating/banning order)

Comments on "Angry fucking rant about LAW BREAKERS!"

 

post a comment